Thinking in Promises

Chapter 2. With a License to Intend

Intentionality is that elusive quality that describes purpose. It is distinctly human judgement. When we intend something, it contributes meaning to our grand designs. We measure our lives by this sense of purpose. It is an intensely sensitive issue for us. Purpose is entirely in the eye of the beholder, and we are the beholders.

An Imposition Too Far

Throwing a ball to someone, without warning, is an imposition. There was no preplanned promise that advertised the intention up front; the ball was simply aimed and thrown. The imposition obviously does not imply an obligation to catch the ball. The imposee (catcher) might not be able to receive the imposition, or might be unwilling to receive it. Either way, the autonomy of the catcher is not compromised by the fact that the thrower attempts to impose upon it.

The thrower might view the purpose of the imposition as an act of kindness, for example, inviting someone to join in the fun. The recipient might simply be annoyed by the imposition, being uninterested in sport or busy with something else.

In the second part of Figure 2-1, the two players have promised to throw and catch, perhaps as part of the agreement to play a game. Was this a rule imposed on them? Perhaps, but in that case they accepted it and decided to promise compliance. If not, perhaps they made up the “rule” themselves. A rule is merely a seed for voluntary cooperation.

Figure 2-1. An imposition does not imply coercion. Autonomous ...