Using the Project Management Maturity Model, 3rd Edition

Index

• Accountability, shared, 83, 124
• Acquisitions, rapid, 18
• Agile project management:
  • and assessments, 171–172
  • PM 2.0 used in, 151
• Applicability of project management, 2
• Assessments, 147–185
  • action plan following from, 182
  • and agile environment, 171–172
  • benchmarking results of, 184–185
  • changing definitions for PM 2.0 and PM 3.0, 158–159
  • and choice of maturity model, 175–177
  • critical issues with PM 1.0, 149–150
  • criticisms of PM 2.0 and PM 3.0, 154–155
  • customizing, for PM2.0 and PM 3.0, 165–170
  • delivery methods for, 177–180
  • and development of remedial training curriculum, 183
  • explaining, 174–175
  • implementing continuous improvement changes, 155–157
  • of intangible benefits and value, 164–165
  • of maturity for PM 2.0 and PM 3.0, 159–164
  • need for PM 2.0, 150–153
  • need for PM 3.0, 153–154
  • overcoming resistance to, 173–174
  • participation in, 181–182
  • redefining maturity, 147–149
  • repeating, 185
  • responsibility for, 180–181
  • and senior management, 183–184
  • timing of, and project management maturity, 28–29
  • updating assessment instruments, 157–158
  • virtual reporting of, 184
• Assessment instruments:
  • for benchmarking (Level 4 of PMMM), 103–107
  • choice of, 175–176
  • for common language (Level 1 of PMMM), 48–63
  • for common processes (Level 2 of PMMM), 70–74
  • for continuous improvement (Level 5 of PMMM), 135–137
  • delivery methods for, 177–180
  • in PMMM, 44
  • for singular methodology (Level 3 of PMMM), 84–94
  • updating, 157–158
• Assumptions:
  • in planning, 149
  • tracking, 168
• Authority:
  • and common language (Level ...