CHAPTER 9Monitoring and Evaluation
Key Take Aways
An important responsibility of trustees is, for all the parts of the process, to monitor and evaluate the overall strategy and selected investment managers. Once the board has decided on the investment strategy, who will implement the different steps and how these will be implemented (e.g. mandate, risk budget), the implementation is set in motion. At this stage, you will want to track whether your fund is performing as you expected in order to alter the strategy or its implementation if necessary. This is not an easy task, mainly because of the fact that capital market outcomes are noisy in the short term: this makes it easy to mistake bad luck (short-term underperformance) for poor skills, and base costly decisions, such as firing and replacing managers, on this. Many behavioral traps come into play at this stage, from a committee shifting into action bias by firing an external manager when there is an underperformance, to the disappointment of trustees, who spent a great deal of time selecting and hiring a manager who subsequently performed below expectations. A high manager turnover rate is a signal that reflects poorly on an investment committee.
Selecting mandates leads to a substantial amount of work for the investment consultants and staff. Yet, once the mandate is selected, most time is spent on monitoring, evaluation, ...
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.
Read now
Unlock full access