
70 DISCRETE
MATHEMATIC..._---------------------------
essentially, the conclusion is already true (anytime the antecedent, i.e., the Boolean expression to the left
of
the arrow is false, the entire implication is true).
We
could use an example in English.
We
could let p be
"I
tell you", q can
be
"You tell Amy" and r
be
"If
you tell Amy, then Bonnie will know", so the conclusion will be
"If
I tell you, Bonnie will know". The
argument is valid,
if
the premise is true.
1.16.6
Dilemma:
Proof
by
Division
into
Cases
(pvq)
(p
~
r)
(q
~
r)
r
This is an interesting argument.
The
first line says that p or q is true.
We
do not know which one, but at