CASE STUDY 4
Why Most Cross-Border Deals End in Tears
Simon London
Hardly a week goes by without news of a company abandoning plans for foreign expansion and retreating to its home market. The latest example of this sorry breed is Scottish Power, the UK utility, which is selling for $ 9.4bn (£5.1bn) the US business it acquired for $ 10bn in 1999. A $ 1.7bn write-off will result.
The tale is so familiar, it begs the question of why companies make overseas acquisitions at all. Yet they do – and in increasing numbers. Cross-border merger and acquisition activity increased fivefold in the 1990s and, following a brief lull, it is making a strong comeback.
Cross-border deals amounted to $ 75bn in the first quarter, a threefold increase from last year, according to Dealogic, the research firm. Eyecatchers include Pernod Ricard's proposed $ 13bn acquisition of drinks rival Allied Domecq and IBM's $ 1.75bn sale of its personal computer business to Lenovo, China's biggest personal computer maker.
Academic findings suggest three legitimate reasons for buying foreign companies. One: such deals can be a quicker, easier way to enter an overseas market than starting from scratch. The acquiring company buys not only an ongoing business but also a brand familiar to customers in the target country. If trade barriers are in place, an acquisition may be the only way to gain access to a new market.
Two: international diversification can stabilise cash flows and make the acquiring company appear less ...
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.
Read now
Unlock full access