The Monge-Kantorovich distance and its financial interpretation 269
Eventually, we compute the infimum over M
+
. If at some point, say (X
0
, Y
0
) ∈
R
n
× R
n
, u
1
(X
0
) + u
2
(Y
0
) > d(X
0
, Y
0
)
p
, then the infimum is −∞ and is
“attained” by P = λδ
X
0
δ
Y
0
with λ −→ +∞. This case can be disregarded
as we compute a supremum over u
1
, u
2
in a second step. If for all (X, Y ),
u
1
(X) + u
2
(Y ) ≤ d(X, Y )
p
, then the infimum is zero. Therefore, we conclude
that
d
MK
(P
1
, P
2
)
p
= sup
u
1
,u
2
E
P
1
[u
1
(X)] + E
P
2
[u
2
(Y )]
subject to the constraints
∀(x, y) ∈ R
n
× R
n
, u
1
(x) + u
2
(y) ≤ d(x, y)
p
This dual problem has a clear economic interpretation: the objective func-
tion u
1
(X) + u
2
(Y ) represents the value of the portfolio composed of two
options written respectively on X and Y with market prices