15Missing Not at Random Models
15.1 Introduction
The examples and methods in Chapters 7–14 were based on the ignorable likelihood:
regarded as a function of the parameter θ for fixed observed data Y(0); in (15.1), X represents fully observed covariates, and f(Y(0)|X, θ) is obtained by integrating the missing data Y(1) out of the density f(Y|X, θ) = f(Y(0), Y(1)|X, θ). In Chapter 6, we showed that sufficient conditions for basing inference about θ on (15.1), rather than the full likelihood from a model for Y and M given X, are that (i) the missing data are missing at random (MAR) and (ii) the parameters θ and ψ are distinct, as defined in Section 6.2. In this chapter, we consider situations where the missingness mechanism is missing not at random (MNAR), and valid ML, Bayesian, and multiple-imputation (MI) inferences generally need to be based on the full likelihood:
regarded as a function of the parameters θ, ψ for fixed observed data Y(0) and missingness pattern M; here f(Y(0), M|X, θ, ψ) is obtained by integrating Y(1) out of the joint density f(Y, M|X, θ, ψ) based on a joint model for Y and M given X.
Two main approaches for formulating MNAR models can be distinguished. We consider them for situations where the units' values of M and Y are modeled as independent ...
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.
Read now
Unlock full access