Introduction
It's terribly important that Oracle get security right, and so far their record has been poor. The Oracle RDBMS has had more critical security vulnerabilities than any other database server product. By critical, I mean those flaws that can be exploited by a remote attacker with no user ID and password and which gives them full control over the database server. To put these critical security vulnerabilities in context, IBM's DB2 has had 1; Informix has had 2; and Microsoft's SQL Server has had 2. Oracle has had 9. That's more than the other database servers put together. In terms of flaws that require a user ID and password but yield full control when exploited, again Oracle outstrips the rest by far. These facts stand in stark contrast to Oracle's marketing campaigns claiming that their product is "unbreakable." When Oracle executives say, "We have the security problem solved. That's what we're good at ...," it makes you wonder what they're talking about. So far the problem is not solved, and complacency should have no home in an organization that develops software that is installed in most governments' networks. This is why it is absolutely critical for Oracle to get it right—national security is at stake.
Oracle's idea of what security means is formed largely on the U.S. Department of Defense's assurance standards. This is why Oracle can state that they "get security." This may have worked 15 years ago, but the security landscape has entirely changed since then. ...
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.
Read now
Unlock full access