Beyond Leibniz’s Dream
totally mistaken. The man understands nothing of chess, he is just a
computer. And the point of the parable is this: if the man does not
understand chess on the basis of running the chess-playing program,
neither does any other computer solely on that basis.
Readers of this book will perhaps notice the arbitrary separation of
software from hardware in this example. The man in the room simply
functions as a crude version of a universal computer. Of course a bare-
bones computer doesn’t play chess. It is only the man together with the
instruction book for which any such claim might be made. Here is my
version of Searle’s parable:
A precocious child whose mother is passionate about chess becomes
tired of watching her play and deman ...