Chapter 3
Job Demands–Resources Theory
Introduction
Why do some employees burn out or get bored by their work, whereas others are so enthusiastic about their work that time seems to fly? The question of what causes job stress and what motivates people has received a lot of research attention during the past five decades. Job design theory has played an important role in this respect. “Job design” was originally defined as the set of opportunities and constraints structured into assigned tasks and responsibilities that affect how an employee accomplishes and experiences work (Hackman & Oldham, 1980). Thus, job design scholars tried to unravel which job characteristics make people feel satisfied with their job, and motivated to reach organizational goals. Nowadays, job design is defined more broadly as “encapsulating the processes and outcomes of how work is structured, organized, experienced, and enacted” (Grant, Fried, & Juillerat, 2010, p. 418). According to Grant and his colleagues, this broader definition opens the door for dynamic, emergent roles as opposed to merely emphasizing static job descriptions composed of fixed tasks assigned by management (see also, Parker, Wall, & Cordery, 2001).
In this chapter, we discuss job demands–resources (JD-R) theory, which represents an extension of the job demands–resources ...
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.
Read now
Unlock full access