Chapter 14. Concurrency on the JVM
Mario Fusco
Originally, raw threads were the only concurrency model available on the JVM, and they’re still the default choice for writing parallel and concurrent programs in Java. When Java was designed 25 years ago, however, the hardware was dramatically different. The demand for running parallel applications was lower, and the concurrency advantages were limited by the lack of multicore processors—tasks could be decoupled, but not executed simultaneously.
Nowadays, the availability and expectation of parallelization has made the limitations of explicit multithreading clear. Threads and locks are too low-level: using them correctly is hard; understanding the Java Memory Model even harder. Threads that communicate through shared mutable state are unfit for massive parallelism, leading to nondeterministic surprises when access isn’t properly synchronized. Moreover, even if your locks are arranged correctly, the purpose of a lock is to restrict threads running in parallel, thus reducing the degree of parallelism of your application.
Because Java does not support distributed memory, it’s impossible to scale multithreaded programs horizontally across multiple machines. And if writing multithreaded programs is difficult, testing them thoroughly is nearly impossible—they frequently become a maintenance nightmare.
The simplest way to overcome the shared ...