
351Materials Substitution
gure of merit, as described in Section 9.5. Following the same procedure of
Section 9.5, the cost of unit strength is calculated as shown in Table 10.7.
Conclusion
As the gure of merit of SS 301-FH is higher than that of the composite material,
the basis material still gives better value than the new material and no substitu-
tion is required.
If, however, the increasing use of the new composite material causes its rela-
tive cost to decrease to 6.6 instead of 7 (Table 10.7), the cost of unit property
becomes 0.837 × 100 instead of 0.93 × 100. In this case, the gure of merit of the
composite material becomes 92.5 × 10 ...