Skip to Content
Python Cookbook
book

Python Cookbook

by Alex Martelli, David Ascher
July 2002
Intermediate to advanced
608 pages
15h 46m
English
O'Reilly Media, Inc.
Content preview from Python Cookbook

Evaluating a Polynomial

Credit: Luther Blissett

Problem

You need to evaluate a polynomial function, and you know that the obvious way to evaluate a polynomial wastes effort; therefore, Horner’s well-known formula should always be used instead.

Solution

We often need to evaluate a polynomial f(x), defined by its coefficients (c[0]+c[1] x x+c[2] x x2+...), at a given point x. There is an obvious (naive) approach to this, applying the polynomial’s definition directly:

def poly_naive(x, coeff):
    result = coeff[0]
    for i in range(1, len(coeff)):
        result = result + coeff[i] * x**i
    return result

However, this is a substantial waste of computational effort, since raising to a power is a time-consuming operation. Here, we’re wantonly raising x to successive powers. It’s better to use Horner’s well-known formula, based on the observation that the polynomial formula can also be indifferently written as c[0]+x x (c[1]+x x (c[2]+.... In other words, it can be written with nested parentheses, but without raise-to-power operations, only additions and multiplications. Coding a loop for it gives us:

def poly_horner(x, coeff):
    result = coeff[-1]
    for i in range(-2, -len(coeff)-1, -1):
        result = result*x + coeff[i]
    return result

Discussion

Python programmers generally emphasize simplicity, not speed. However, when equally simple solutions exist, and one is always faster (even by a little), it seems sensible to use the faster solution. Polynomial evaluation is a case in point. The naive approach takes an addition, ...

Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.

Read now

Unlock full access

More than 5,000 organizations count on O’Reilly

AirBnbBlueOriginElectronic ArtsHomeDepotNasdaqRakutenTata Consultancy Services

QuotationMarkO’Reilly covers everything we've got, with content to help us build a world-class technology community, upgrade the capabilities and competencies of our teams, and improve overall team performance as well as their engagement.
Julian F.
Head of Cybersecurity
QuotationMarkI wanted to learn C and C++, but it didn't click for me until I picked up an O'Reilly book. When I went on the O’Reilly platform, I was astonished to find all the books there, plus live events and sandboxes so you could play around with the technology.
Addison B.
Field Engineer
QuotationMarkI’ve been on the O’Reilly platform for more than eight years. I use a couple of learning platforms, but I'm on O'Reilly more than anybody else. When you're there, you start learning. I'm never disappointed.
Amir M.
Data Platform Tech Lead
QuotationMarkI'm always learning. So when I got on to O'Reilly, I was like a kid in a candy store. There are playlists. There are answers. There's on-demand training. It's worth its weight in gold, in terms of what it allows me to do.
Mark W.
Embedded Software Engineer

You might also like

Python Workout

Python Workout

Reuven M. Lerner
Python Cookbook, 3rd Edition

Python Cookbook, 3rd Edition

David Beazley, Brian K. Jones

Publisher Resources

ISBN: 0596001673Catalog PageErrata