August 2017
Beginner to intermediate
274 pages
8h 11m
English
One of the most frequent criticisms levelled at digital forensic investigators comes in the form of a challenge to the soundness of the evidence they are presenting. This includes the common It wasn't me defense, wherein a defendant insists that they were not the one using the device in question; the suggestion that the evidence itself is somehow faulty; either because of a virus or malware having infected a device before it was analysed, or because the process of analysis itself has modified the data in some way.
There are a couple of ways to deal with these concerns, so lets take a look at them one by one.
Read now
Unlock full access