Version Control with Subversion, 2nd Edition

Using Branches

At this point, you should understand how each commit creates an entirely new filesystem tree (called a “revision”) in the repository. If you don’t, go back and read about revisions in Revisions.

For this chapter, we’ll go back to the same example from Chapter 1. Remember that you and your collaborator, Sally, are sharing a repository that contains two projects, paint and calc. Notice that in Figure 4-2, however, each project directory now contains subdirectories named trunk and branches. The reason for this will soon become clear.

Figure 4-2. Starting repository layout

As before, assume that Sally and you both have working copies of the “calc” project. Specifically, you each have a working copy of /calc/trunk. All the files for the project are in this subdirectory rather than in /calc itself, because your team has decided that /calc/trunk is where the “main line” of development is going to take place.

Let’s say that you’ve been given the task of implementing a large software feature. It will take a long time to write, and it will affect all the files in the project. The immediate problem is that you don’t want to interfere with Sally, who is in the process of fixing small bugs here and there. She’s depending on the fact that the latest version of the project (in /calc/trunk) is always usable. If you start committing your changes bit by bit, you’ll surely break things for Sally (and other team members as well).

One strategy is to crawl into a hole: you and Sally can stop sharing information for a week or two. That is, start gutting and reorganizing all the files in your working copy, but don’t commit or update until you’re completely finished with the task. There are a number of problems with this, though. First, it’s not very safe. Most people like to save their work to the repository frequently, should something bad accidentally happen to their working copy. Second, it’s not very flexible. If you do your work on different computers (perhaps you have a working copy of /calc/trunk on two different machines), you’ll need to manually copy your changes back and forth or just do all the work on a single computer. By that same token, it’s difficult to share your changes in progress with anyone else. A common software development “best practice” is to allow your peers to review your work as you go. If nobody sees your intermediate commits, you lose potential feedback and may end up going down the wrong path for weeks before another person on your team notices. Finally, when you’re finished with all your changes, you might find it very difficult to remerge your final work with the rest of the company’s main body of code. Sally (or others) may have made many other changes in the repository that are difficult to incorporate into your working copy—especially if you run svn update after weeks of isolation.

The better solution is to create your own branch, or line of development, in the repository. This allows you to save your half-broken work frequently without interfering with others, yet you can still selectively share information with your collaborators. You’ll see exactly how this works as we go.

Creating a Branch

Creating a branch is very simple—you make a copy of the project in the repository using the svn copy command. Subversion is able to copy not only single files but whole directories as well. In this case, you want to make a copy of the /calc/trunk directory. Where should the new copy live? Wherever you wish—it’s a matter of project policy. Let’s say that your team has a policy of creating branches in the /calc/branches area of the repository, and you want to name your branch my-calc-branch. You’ll want to create a new directory, /calc/branches/my-calc-branch, which begins its life as a copy of /calc/trunk.

You may already have seen svn copy used to copy one file to another within a working copy. But it can also be used to do a “remote” copy entirely within the repository. Just copy one URL to another:

$ svn copy http://svn.example.com/repos/calc/trunk \
           http://svn.example.com/repos/calc/branches/my-calc-branch \
      -m "Creating a private branch of /calc/trunk."

Committed revision 341.

This command causes a near-instantaneous commit in the repository, creating a new directory in revision 341. The new directory is a copy of /calc/trunk, as shown in Figure 4-3.^[20] While it’s possible to create a branch by using svn copy to duplicate a directory within the working copy, this technique isn’t recommended. It can be quite slow, in fact! Copying a directory on the client side is a linear-time operation, in that it actually has to duplicate every file and subdirectory on the local disk. Copying a directory on the server, however, is a constant-time operation, and it’s the way most people create branches.

Figure 4-3. Repository with new copy

Cheap Copies

Subversion’s repository has a special design. When you copy a directory, you don’t need to worry about the repository growing huge—Subversion doesn’t actually duplicate any data. Instead, it creates a new directory entry that points to an existing tree. If you’re an experienced Unix user, you’ll recognize this as the same concept behind a hard link. As further changes are made to files and directories beneath the copied directory, Subversion continues to employ this hard link concept where it can. It duplicates data only when it is necessary to disambiguate different versions of objects.

This is why you’ll often hear Subversion users talk about “cheap copies.” It doesn’t matter how large the directory is—it takes a very tiny, constant amount of time and space to make a copy of it. In fact, this feature is the basis of how commits work in Subversion: each revision is a “cheap copy” of the previous revision, with a few items lazily changed within. (To read more about this, visit Subversion’s web site and read about the “bubble up” method in Subversion’s design documents.)

Of course, these internal mechanics of copying and sharing data are hidden from the user, who simply sees copies of trees. The point is that copies are cheap, both in time and in space. If you create a branch entirely within the repository (by running svn copy URL1 URL2), it’s a quick, constant-time operation. Make branches as often as you want.

Working with Your Branch

Now that you’ve created a branch of the project, you can check out a new working copy to start using it:

$ svn checkout http://svn.example.com/repos/calc/branches/my-calc-branch
A  my-calc-branch/Makefile
A  my-calc-branch/integer.c
A  my-calc-branch/button.c
Checked out revision 341.

There’s nothing special about this working copy; it simply mirrors a different directory in the repository. When you commit changes, however, Sally won’t see them when she updates, because her working copy is of /calc/trunk. (Be sure to read Traversing Branches; the svn switch command is an alternative way of creating a working copy of a branch.)

Let’s pretend that a week goes by, and the following commits happen:

• You make a change to /calc/branches/my-calc-branch/button.c, which creates revision 342.

• You make a change to /calc/branches/my-calc-branch/integer.c, which creates revision 343.

• Sally makes a change to /calc/trunk/integer.c, which creates revision 344.

Figure 4-4. The branching of one file’s history

Now, two independent lines of development (shown in Figure 4-4) are happening on integer.c. Things get interesting when you look at the history of changes made to your copy of integer.c:

$ pwd
/home/user/my-calc-branch

$ svn log -v integer.c
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r343 | user | 2002-11-07 15:27:56 -0600 (Thu, 07 Nov 2002) | 2 lines
Changed paths:
   M /calc/branches/my-calc-branch/integer.c

* integer.c:  frozzled the wazjub.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r341 | user | 2002-11-03 15:27:56 -0600 (Thu, 07 Nov 2002) | 2 lines
Changed paths:
   A /calc/branches/my-calc-branch (from /calc/trunk:340)

Creating a private branch of /calc/trunk.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r303 | sally | 2002-10-29 21:14:35 -0600 (Tue, 29 Oct 2002) | 2 lines
Changed paths:
   M /calc/trunk/integer.c

* integer.c:  changed a docstring.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r98 | sally | 2002-02-22 15:35:29 -0600 (Fri, 22 Feb 2002) | 2 lines
Changed paths:
   A /calc/trunk/integer.c

* integer.c:  adding this file to the project.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notice that Subversion is tracing the history of your branch’s integer.c all the way back through time, even traversing the point where it was copied. It shows the creation of the branch as an event in the history, because integer.c was implicitly copied when all of /calc/trunk/ was copied. Now look at what happens when Sally runs the same command on her copy of the file:

$ pwd
/home/sally/calc

$ svn log -v integer.c
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r344 | sally | 2002-11-07 15:27:56 -0600 (Thu, 07 Nov 2002) | 2 lines
Changed paths:
   M /calc/trunk/integer.c

* integer.c:  fix a bunch of spelling errors.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r303 | sally | 2002-10-29 21:14:35 -0600 (Tue, 29 Oct 2002) | 2 lines
Changed paths:
   M /calc/trunk/integer.c

* integer.c:  changed a docstring.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r98 | sally | 2002-02-22 15:35:29 -0600 (Fri, 22 Feb 2002) | 2 lines
Changed paths:
   A /calc/trunk/integer.c

* integer.c:  adding this file to the project.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sally sees her own revision 344 change, but not the change you made in revision 343. As far as Subversion is concerned, these two commits affected different files in different repository locations. However, Subversion does show that the two files share a common history. Before the branch copy was made in revision 341, the files used to be the same file. That’s why you and Sally both see the changes made in revisions 303 and 98.

The Key Concepts Behind Branching

You should remember two important lessons from this section. First, Subversion has no internal concept of a branch—it knows only how to make copies. When you copy a directory, the resultant directory is only a “branch” because you attach that meaning to it. You may think of the directory differently, or treat it differently, but to Subversion it’s just an ordinary directory that happens to carry some extra historical information.

Second, because of this copy mechanism, Subversion’s branches exist as normal filesystem directories in the repository. This is different from other version control systems, where branches are typically defined by adding extra-dimensional “labels” to collections of files. The location of your branch directory doesn’t matter to Subversion. Most teams follow a convention of putting all branches into a /branches directory, but you’re free to invent any policy you wish.

---

^[20] Subversion does not support copying between different repositories. When using URLs with svn copy or svn move, you can only copy items within the same repository.