1.6 NOTATIONAL CONVENTIONS
Unless otherwise specified, bit rates correspond to single-channel or monaural coding throughout this text. Subjective quality measurements are specified in terms of either the five-point mean opinion score (MOS, Table 1.3) or the 41-point subjective difference grade (SDG, Chapter 12, Table 12.1). Table 1.4 lists some of the symbols and notation used in the book.
Table 1.3. Mean opinion score (MOS) scale.
| MOS | Perceptual quality |
| 1 | Bad |
| 2 | Poor |
| 3 | Average |
| 4 | Good |
| 5 | Excellent |
Table 1.4. Symbols and notation used in the book.
| Symbol/notation | Description |
| t, n |
Time index/sample index |
| ω, Ω |
Frequency index (analog domain, discrete domain) |
| f(= ω/2π) |
Frequency (Hz) |
| Fs, Ts |
Sampling frequency, sampling period |
| x(t) ↔ X(ω) |
Continuous-time Fourier transform (FT) pair |
| x(n) ↔ X(Ω) |
Discrete-time Fourier transform (DTFT) pair |
| x(n) ↔ X(z) |
z transform pair |
| s[.] |
Indicates a particular element in a coefficient array |
| h(n) ↔ H(Ω) |
Impulse-frequency response pair of a discrete time system |
| e(n) |
Error/prediction residual |
|
Transfer function consisting of numerator-polynomial and denominator-polynomial (corresponding to b-coefficients and a-coefficients) |
|
|
Predicted signal |
|
|
Quantization/approximation operator or estimated/encoded ... |
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.
Read now
Unlock full access