8
↔
Virtu, Virtue, and Success
T
HE RU 486 DECISION
represents the most complex
type of defining moment. Edouard Sakiz, the chairman of
Roussel-Uclaf, had to choose among many compelling re-
sponsibilities: to his conscience, shareholders, employees, women,
physicians, scientists, government health agencies, and—in the
minds of his vigilant, well-organized critics—to the unborn. All
these right-versus-right tradeoffs converged on Sakiz’s desk.
At the same time, the RU 486 decision was a defining moment for
Sakiz personally. He had responsibilities as a physician, a scientist, a
manager, a shareholder’s agent, a citizen, and a family member.
Like Steve Lewis and Peter Adario, Sakiz’s actions would indicate
which of these responsibilities had the deepest roots ...