
Conclusions 95
It may, of course, happen that a new best position is found, but in this
procedure P
g
is not updated.
To explain the ruthless procedure, assume that the 4 − th individual is
replaced by updated P
g
. Then:
X
1
={0.7063, 1.4554, −2.5622}
X
2
={1.4010, 1.8743, 0.1804}
X
3
={0.6700, 1.4383, 0.3645}
X
4
={0.2428, 1.2697, −0.3872}
X
5
={0.9975, 2.0541, −2.1880},
and their objective functions have the following values: OF (X
1
)=24.4302,
OF (X
2
)=9.0864, OF (X
3
)=4.9851, OF (X
4
)=3.7329, OF (X
5
)=23.7965.
It should be noted at this point that after the first iteration the better
global solution is obtained with OF = 3.7329 (X
4
= [0.2428, 1.2697, −0.3872]).
7.6 Conclusions ...