Warranty Fraud Management
by Matti Kurvinen, Ilkka Töyrylä, D. N. Prabhakar Murthy, Maximilian Kammerer
Appendix B
Agency Theory
The figures and text in this appendix are adapted from Murthy and Jack (2014), pp. 85–86, with the permission of Springer.
Agency theory attempts to explain the relationship that exists between two parties (a principal and an agent) where the principal delegates work to the agent, who performs that work under a contract. This is exactly the case where one is looking at service agent fraud. The warranty provider is the principal delegating the warranty servicing to a service agent.
Agency theory is concerned with resolving two problems that can occur in principal–agent relationships. The first issue arises when the two parties have conflicting objectives, and it is difficult or expensive for the principal to verify what the agent is actually doing and whether the agent has behaved appropriately. The second issue is the risk sharing that takes place when the principal and the agent have different attitudes to risk (due to various uncertainties). Each party may prefer different actions because of their different risk preferences.
The different issues that are involved in agency theory are indicated in Figure B.1 and discussed briefly in this appendix.1
Figure B.1 Issues in agency theory
- Moral hazardThis refers to the agent's possible lack of effort in carrying out the delegated tasks and the fact that it is difficult for the principal to assess the effort ...
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.
Read now
Unlock full access