Quick Introduction to Lambda Functions
Adding lambda functions to C++ would let a programmer write a loop body in-place instead of having to write a separate STL-style function object. Similar capability is found in the anonymous method in C#, in the inner class in Java, and in the primordial lambda expression of LISP.
For example, currently a programmer who wants to convert a sequential for loop into a parallel_for has to write something like this:
// Without lambda expression
class ApplyFoo {
public:
int my_x;
ApplyFoo( int x ) : my_x(x) {}
void operator()(const blocked_range<size_t>& r) const {
for(size_t i=r.begin(); i!=r.end(); ++i)
Foo(i,my_x);
}
};
void ParallelApplyFoo(size_t n, int x) {
parallel_for(blocked_range<size_t>(0,n,10),
ApplyFoo(x));
}In particular, the programmer has to deal with capturing the value of parameter x in ParallelApplyFoo so that it can be referenced from ApplyFoo. The addition of lambda expressions, as recently proposed to the C++ Standards Committee, would enable the preceding example to be written more concisely as:
// With lambda expression
void ParallelApplyFoo(size_t n, int x) {
parallel_for(
blocked_range<size_t>(0,n,10),
<>const blocked_range<size_t>& r) {
for(size_t i=r.begin(); i<r.end(); ++i)
Foo(i,x);
});
}The <> directs the compiler to convert the expression after it into a function object that does everything the handcoded ApplyFoo would do. In general, lambda expressions let programmers pass blocks of code as parameters without having ...
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.
Read now
Unlock full access