December 2011
Beginner
556 pages
17h 18m
English
Questions of validity, that is, how we know that research findings are trustworthy, are constants in conversations about research methodology. Like all researchers, ethnographers must convince readers and reviewers that their work is credible; that events in the field are described accurately, and in scientific terms; and that the research findings are valid. Ethnographers define validity in particular ways. According to Roger Sanjek (1990), ethnographic validity is determined “according to three canons: theoretical candor, the ethnographer's path, and fieldnote evidence” (p. 395). In other words, validity-rich ethnography is transparent.
The ethnographer shows how her choices about fieldwork—from the initial ...
Read now
Unlock full access