advertising change consumer behavior without changing tastes. Then, although adver-
tising may have some social value in an imperfectly competitive market, by raising output
it is clearly over-provided in equilibrium.
68
That persuasive advertising by a monopolist
is excessive remains valid under fairly general conditions, even if welfare is measured
using the post-advertising tastes. However, similar conditions also imply that the provi-
sion of quality information through informative advertising is excessive. By contrast,
informative advertising by a monopolist that makes consumers aware of the product’s
existence and attributes is clearly insufficient.
69
Allowing for consumer naivety is a natural way of explaining why ads do not inform
consumers