Common Errors in Statistics (and How to Avoid Them), 4th Edition
by Phillip I. Good, James W. Hardin
INFERIOR TESTS
Violation of assumptions can affect not only the significance level of a test but the power of the test as well; see Tukey and MacLaughlin [1963] and Box and Tiao [1964]. For example, although the significance level of the t-test is robust to departures from normality, the power of the t-test is not. Thus, the two-sample permutation test may always be preferable.
If blocking including matched pairs was used in the original design then the same division into blocks should be employed in the analysis. Confounding factors such as sex, race, and diabetic condition can easily mask the effect we hoped to measure through the comparison of two samples. Similarly, an overall risk factor can be totally misleading [Gigerenzer, 2002]. Blocking reduces the differences between subjects so that differences between treatment groups stand out, if, that is, the appropriate analysis is used. Thus, paired data should always be analyzed with the paired t-test or its permutation equivalent, not with the group t-test.
To analyze a block design (for example, where we have sampled separately from whites, blacks, and Hispanics), the permutation test statistic is
,where xbj is the jth observation in the control sample in the bth block, and the rearranging of labels between control and treated samples takes place separately and independently within each of the B blocks [Good, 2001, p. 124].
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.
Read now
Unlock full access