Managing Design

Illustrations

Figures

Figure 0.1 This Is My Dad Going to Work, p. xv, Danielle LeFevre.

Figure 0.2 Design versus Construction Process, p. xviii, Chuck Thomsen.

Figure 12.1 McKinsey 7-S +1 diagram, p. 167

Figure 16.1 Using target value limits, p. 218

Figure 16.2 Project Design Controls framework with “Level 0: Contracts and Team Assembly,” p. 219

Figure 17.1 Project Design Controls Framework “Level 0: Subsurface,” p. 224

Figure 17.2 Project Delivery Timelines and Project Control Timing, p. 226

Figure 18.1 Project Design Controls Framework “Level 1: Foundation,” p. 229

Figure 18.2 Project Analysis, p. 233

Figure 19.1 Project Design Controls Framework “Level 2: Structure,” p. 242

Figure 19.2 Collect | Analyze | Synthesize, p. 256

Figure 19.3 Individual | Group, p. 257

Figure 19.4 Diverge | Converge, p. 257

Figure 20.1 Project Design Controls Framework “Level 3: Systems,” p. 264

Figure 20.2 Alignment, p. 264

Figure 21.1 Project Design Controls Framework “Level 4: Enclosure,” p. 271

Figure 22.1 Project Design Controls Framework with “Context,” p. 274

Figure 23.1 “The Science of Muddling Through,” p. 283, after T. Sargent and C. Lindblom.

Figure CS1.1 Georgia Tech Manufacturing Research Center, Progressive Architecture cover photo, p.299, Jonathan Hillyer

Figure CS1.2 Georgia Tech MARC: Brick Detail, p. 302

Figure CS1.3 Georgia Tech MARC: Physical Model, p. 302

Figure CS1.4 Georgia Tech MARC: Atrium, p. 303, Jonathan Hillyer

Figure CS1.5 Georgia Tech MARC Drawing: “Things That Move,” ...