Executive's Guide to Project Management: Organizational Processes and Practices for Supporting Complex Projects
by Robert K. Wysocki
Goal and Solution Clarity
I like simple and intuitive models and I spent a lot of time defining and redefining project categories before I found a classification scheme that met my criteria and my specific needs. The one I am using here I have used for almost 20 years. It works and has never failed to live up to my expectations.
Every project has a goal and hopefully there is a plan that defines how you will reach that goal (a.k.a. a solution). So I define the project landscape around the two fundamental project variables: goal and solution. In my classification scheme these two variables can have only one of two values: clear or not clear. I experimented with more than two values for each variable but that only added complication without adding value. Those two values for each variable generate the four-quadrant matrix shown in Figure 1.2.
Figure 1.2 The Four Quadrants of the Project Landscape
I don't know where the dividing line is between clear and not clear but that is not important to this landscape anyway. These values are conceptual not quantifiable. A given project can exhibit various degrees of complexity and uncertainty that position it in one of the four quadrants at a particular point in time. As a project is undertaken the complexity and uncertainty originally associated with it will often change. That could justify changing its quadrant and also changing how the project ...
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.
Read now
Unlock full access