
Silverston c08.tex V2 - 11/21/2008 3:12am Page 465
Summary of Patterns 465
NOTE
There are also other alternate ways of maintaining the various roles for
BUSINESS RULE(s), and we suggest you see Chapter 3 for a discussion of some of
these alternatives.
This pattern supports the creation of any other business rule roles that may be
defined by your enterprise. You are not just limited to the roles that we have
defined, based on Ron Ross’s business rule principles. But Ron Ross’s business
rules roles are a good guide for the type of roles involved in business rules.
When Should This Pattern Be Used?
We use this pattern when:
There is a need to capture the different PARTY(s) that are involved
with BUSINESS RULE(s) in various ROLE TYPE(s) over time. Possible
ROLE TYPE(s) include ‘‘Rule manager,’’ ‘‘Authorized rule user,’’ ‘‘Rule
specifier,’’ and Rule source’’; however, the pattern supports any num-
ber of roles, parties involved, at many different times for any BUSINESS
RULE(s).
What Are the Weaknesses of the Pattern?
The weakness of this pattern is as follows:
Some enterprises may not need this amount of detail. They may be
interested in the specification of only the business rules and perhaps one
or two key roles. Thus, an alternative is to apply a different Contextual
Role Pattern instead of the Level 3 Contextual Role Pattern shown in this
chapter.
Synopsis
In this section we described how PARTY(s) playing