
Silverston c04.tex V2 - 11/21/2008 3:02am Page 151
Level 2 Recursive Pattern 151
After starting the effort, XYZ realized that they needed to further break
down tasks into subtasks. The last two rows in Table 4-2 illustrate the
flexibility of this pattern to accommodate new requirements such as this
one, without changing the data model. Thus a new WORK EFFORT TYPE
name of ‘‘Subtask’’ may be added and the last two rows show that the task
‘‘Discover Target Requirements’’ is made up of ‘‘Conduct Interviews’’ and
‘‘Model Target Requirements.’’
Some work efforts may depend on others being completed before they can
start. Figure 4-7 shows that ‘‘Each WORK EFFORT may be dependent on
one and only one WORK EFFORT. Table 4-3 illustrates an example of this
and shows that the ‘‘Create Mapping’’ instance of TASK is dependent on the
‘‘Create Mapping Template’’ being completed. This is an example of using this
pattern not for a hierarchy or aggregation, but for a peer-to-peer relationship.
Table 4-3 Example of Level 2 Recursive Pattern, DEPENDENCY
WORK WORK WORK WORK EFFORT. WORK WORK
EFFORT. EFFORT. EFFORT WORK EFFORT EFFORT. EFFORT TYPE.
WORK NAME TYPE. ID (FOR NAME (FOR NAME (FOR
EFFORT ID NAME PREREQUISITE) PREREQUISITE) PREREQUISITE)
9010 Create
Mapping
Task 9005 Create Mapping
Template
Task
In Figure 4-7 there are two recursive relationships, one stating that ‘‘each
WORK EFFORT may be made up of one or more WORK ...