Overdispersion
Overdispersion is the polite statistician's version of Murphy's law: if something can go wrong, it will. Overdispersion can be a problem when working with Poisson or binomial errors, and tends to occur because you have not measured one or more of the factors that turn out to be important. It may also result from the underlying distribution being non-Poisson or non-binomial. This means that the probability you are attempting to model is not constant within each cell, but behaves like a random variable. This, in turn, means that the residual deviance is inflated. In the worst case, all the predictor variables you have measured may turn out to be unimportant so that you have no information at all on any of the genuinely important predictors. In this case, the minimal adequate model is just the overall mean, and all your ‘explanatory’ variables provide no extra information.
The techniques of dealing with overdispersion are discussed in detail when we consider Poisson errors (p. 527) and binomial errors (p. 569). Here it is sufficient to point out that there are two general techniques available to us:
- use F tests with an empirical scale parameter instead of chi-squared;
- use quasi-likelihood to specify a more appropriate variance function.
It is important, however, to stress that these techniques introduce another level of uncertainty into the analysis. Overdispersion happens for real, scientifically important reasons, and these reasons may throw doubt upon our ability ...
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.
Read now
Unlock full access