The Internal Community Monitoring Maturity Model
As we’ve done with other kinds of monitoring, let’s look at how internal community monitoring becomes more mature over time. Note that because your audience is in-house, you’ll be more concerned with productivity and contribution by the organization and by its ability to create useful content that becomes an asset.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Focus | Technical details | Minding your own house | Engaging the organization | Building relationships | Web business strategy |
Emphasis | Volume of content | Usefulness of content | Contribution patterns | Collaboration patterns, ROI from predictions, productivity gains | Community data mining, employee performance reviews based on contribution |
Questions | How much information have we generated? | How good is the information we’re generating? What’s most and least used? How easily can employees find it? | How integrated is KM with corporate culture? What are people sharing most and least? | What’s the payoff? How does KM improve per-employee contribution or reduce per-employee cost? How are people connecting with one another? Are our collective guesses good? | What does our organization know? What is our organizational knowledge worth? How can we use better KM posture to improve competitive position? Are we hiring and firing based on employee knowledge contribution? |
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.
Read now
Unlock full access