August 2004
Intermediate to advanced
656 pages
15h 28m
English
A common—but potentially ineffective—strategy to allow for uncertainties is to use more conservative decision criteria. This includes increasing the MARR for more uncertain alternatives, shortening the study period, or requiring a shorter payback period. People tend to assume that if the alternative is still desirable in spite of the more conservative decision criteria, the alternative should still be desirable at the normal criteria even if one or more of the uncertain estimates turns out less favorable than hoped. The “padding” in the conservative decision criteria is expected to be an allowance for inaccuracy in the estimates. Unfortunately this strategy doesn't always work.
Read now
Unlock full access