THE CONCEPT OF DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
Suppose that Midland Plastics purchased a piece of equipment on January 1, 2009, for $9,000. The equipment is expected to have a three-year useful life and no salvage value. Midland computes depreciation using the double-declining-balance (DDB) method for income tax purposes and straight-line for reporting purposes. In 2009, Midland's choice to use two different depreciation methods creates an income tax expense on the income statement, which is based on straight-line depreciation, that is greater than its income tax liability, which is based on double-declining-balance depreciation. In 2010 and 2011, the difference reverses itself, and the income tax expense is less than the income tax liability. Figure 10B-1 provides a schedule of these differences and, assuming an income tax rate of 30 percent, computes the tax effects associated with using DDB instead of straight-line for tax purposes.
FIGURE 10B-1 Income tax effects due to DDB depreciation

Note that use of the DDB method, instead of straight-line, creates a tax savings of $900 in 2009, the first year of the equipment's useful life. In 2010 and 2011, however, this benefit reverses itself, giving rise to additional tax payments of $300 in 2010 and $600 in 2011. As of the end of 2009, Midland can view these additional tax payments as liabilities, because many consider them to be future obligations. ...
Become an O’Reilly member and get unlimited access to this title plus top books and audiobooks from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers, thousands of courses curated by job role, 150+ live events each month,
and much more.
Read now
Unlock full access