160 Human–Computer etiquette
to the person or the situation. However, to avoid the extensive cognitive
eort that such a judgment would require, people often just assume that
another’s intentions correspond to behavior, or use naïve causal hypoth-
esis testing. In addition, humans are plagued by many self-serving biases
allowing them to attribute positive outcomes to their own personal
properties and actions and negative ones to outside circumstances.
7.4.4 Causal Attributions with Automated Partners
Do people make attributions (and attribution errors) when they try
to explain an automated aid’s “behavior?” To what extent do human
operators seek out distinctiveness, consensus, and consistency infor-
mation to explain their automated aid’s